Economics Dictionary of Arguments

Home Screenshot Tabelle Begriffe

 
Type theory: Restriction of formal systems to a type of reference that prevents symbols of one level (of one type) from referring to symbols of the same level (of the same type). This is intended to avoid paradoxes arising from the self-referentiality of the symbols or expressions used. Original proposals for type theories come from B. Russell (B. Russell, Mathematical logic as based on the theory of types, in American Journal of Mathematics 30 (1908), pp. 222-262). See also Self-reference, Circularity, Paradoxes, Russell's paradox, Stages, Branched type theory.
_____________
Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments.

 
Author Concept Summary/Quotes Sources

Robert Brandom on Type Theory - Dictionary of Arguments

I 611
(Type theory) "Everyone": = any person "Someone": = a person - "All": is usually limited E.g. Everything that is on the table. >Domains
,>Type/Token, >Hierarchies, >Paradoxes, >Universal quantification, >Existential quantification.

_____________
Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments
The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Making it exlicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge/MA 1994
German Edition:
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Articulating reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism, Cambridge/MA 2001
German Edition:
Begründen und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


Send Link
> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Type Theory

Authors A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z  


Concepts A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   Z